Boeing’s recovery efforts face another hurdle as over 3,000 defence-sector employees prepare to go on strike Monday, following a failed contract negotiation. The strike adds to ongoing challenges for the aerospace giant, already grappling with supply chain disruptions, production delays, and reputational issues.
Union Members Reject Boeing’s Offer
Approximately 3,200 members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM), based in the St. Louis area, voted to reject Boeing’s latest four-year labour contract proposal. The union confirmed that a strike would begin at midnight on Monday.
These workers play a key role in assembling Boeing’s F-15 Eagle and F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter jets, along with a variety of missiles and munitions vital to U.S. defense programs.
Strike Threatens Key Defence Programs
Boeing’s defence business, which employs more than 19,000 workers, accounted for 29% of the company’s $22.75 billion revenue in the second quarter. The unit has been showing signs of improvement—posting $110 million in operating profit this quarter, a significant turnaround from a $913 million loss in the same period last year.
The division is responsible for several high-profile projects, including the F-47 fighter jet, which Boeing recently secured a contract to produce. However, the unit has also faced criticism over cost overruns and delays—particularly with programs such as the new Air Force One jets.
Not the First Labour Disruption
The looming walkout comes less than a year after a two-month strike in Washington state, where 33,000 Boeing employees halted production of the 737 Max, resulting in billions of dollars in losses. That strike significantly disrupted Boeing’s commercial aircraft operations and delayed recovery efforts.
This new strike, while smaller in scale, poses risks to Boeing’s defence segment, which the company sees as a cornerstone of its turnaround strategy following quality control concerns and a series of headline-grabbing incidents, including:
-
A door panel blowout on an Alaska Airlines jet earlier this year, triggering increased regulatory scrutiny on Boeing’s manufacturing practices.
-
A deadly Air India crash involving a Boeing 787-8, though Indian authorities did not place blame on the manufacturer.
Union and Company Respond
Union leaders argue that workers deserve a contract that reflects their value and skill.
“These workers build the aircraft and defence systems that keep our country safe,” said Sam Cicinelli, IAM Midwest territory general vice-president. “They deserve a contract that ensures financial stability for their families and recognises their unmatched expertise.”
Boeing, however, expressed disappointment over the rejection, noting that its proposal included an average wage increase of 40% and addressed concerns about alternative work schedules.
“We are prepared for a strike and have fully implemented our contingency plan to ensure our non-striking workforce can continue supporting our customers,” said Dan Gillian, Boeing’s vice-president of air dominance.
Company Downplays Impact
During an earnings call, CEO Kelly Ortberg acknowledged the strike but downplayed its likely impact:
“This is nowhere near the scale of last year’s disruption… I wouldn’t worry too much about the implications. We’re focused on returning our defence unit to high single-digit margins.”
The Pentagon, which is Boeing’s primary customer for military contracts, has not issued a comment on the situation.
Conclusion:
The strike, while smaller than last year’s labor action, underscores persistent tensions between Boeing and its workforce as the company works to stabilize operations. As Boeing aims to rebuild trust and improve margins in its defence unit, the outcome of this dispute may prove a critical test.