In a recent development, eleven members of the US Congress, led by Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, have called for the suspension of future US assistance to Pakistan. This move is contingent on Pakistan’s commitment to restoring constitutional order and conducting free and fair elections, amid growing concerns over human rights violations and the strengthening of blasphemy laws.
The lawmakers’ letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken highlights several troubling aspects of Pakistan’s recent actions, focusing on the proposed amendments to blasphemy laws. The concern is that these amendments could further marginalize religious minorities and smaller religious groups. The passing of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2023, which aims to reinforce the existing blasphemy law, has raised alarm due to its potential to be used against religious minorities, as historically demonstrated. The letter also draws attention to broader human rights issues in Pakistan, including restrictions on freedom of expression, speech, and religion, enforced disappearances, military courts, and the harassment and arrest of political opponents and human rights defenders.
The move to suspend future US assistance is rooted in a call for a legal assessment under the Leahy Laws and Section 502(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act. The lawmakers are seeking to determine if US-origin security assistance has been implicated in human rights violations in Pakistan. They argue that future security assistance should be withheld until Pakistan demonstrates a clear commitment to constitutional restoration and the organization of free and fair elections with the participation of all political parties.
One of the central concerns raised in the letter is the rapid passage of the blasphemy law amendments, despite calls for thorough parliamentary procedures. The lawmakers argue that this raises questions about the democratic process in Pakistan and the protection of fundamental rights. The situation has further complicated the already intricate relationship between the United States and Pakistan, requiring a nuanced approach from Washington.
Congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s leadership in this initiative, coupled with the support from members like Frank Pallone Jr, Joaquin Castro, Summer Lee, Ted W Lieu, Dina Titus, Lloyd Doggett, and Cori Bush, signifies a stance from the progressive wing of Congress. These members have been known for their advocacy on global issues, including the Palestinian cause, and their participation in rallies demanding ceasefires in conflict zones like Gaza. The letter, therefore, reflects not only concerns about Pakistan’s internal affairs but also a broader commitment to human rights and democratic values in the international arena
The situation prompts a closer examination of the broader US policy towards Pakistan and the weight Islamabad carries in shaping that policy, according to experts. Over the history, the US-Pakistan relationship has been marked by periods of cooperation and tension. Pakistan’s strategic importance, especially in the context of Afghanistan and counterterrorism efforts, has often influenced the US approach. However, the recent emphasis on human rights and democratic values in the lawmakers’ letter signals a potential shift in priorities.
In contrast, the US policy towards India has been undergoing a noticeable evolution. India, with its robust democratic institutions, economic potential, and strategic importance in the Indo-Pacific region, has been gaining increased attention and support from the United States. The Biden administration’s focus on strengthening alliances in the region, particularly the Quad partnership with India, Japan, and Australia, underscores India’s growing significance in US foreign policy.
The comparison between US policy on India and Pakistan reveals a nuanced approach shaped by a combination of geopolitical considerations and values-based diplomacy. While the United States continues to engage with Pakistan due to its role in regional stability, the emphasis on democratic values and human rights in the lawmakers’ letter indicates a growing recognition of the need to address internal issues in US foreign policy.
In conclusion, the current developments in the US-Pakistan relationship highlight the complex interplay between geopolitical alliances and the promotion of democratic values. The lawmakers’ call for a reassessment of US assistance to Pakistan based on human rights concerns underscores the evolving nature of US foreign policy. Meanwhile, the increasing attention on India reflects a recognition of its strategic importance and commitment to shared democratic values. The coming months will likely witness further recalibrations in US policy towards South Asia, as the Biden administration seeks to balance its geopolitical interests with a commitment to upholding democratic principles on the global stage.
